June 2020 - Unreliable Narrators

Sunday, June 28, 2020

Eurovision Song Contest: The Story of Fire Saga (Film Review)

Sunday, June 28, 2020 0
Eurovision Song Contest: The Story of Fire Saga (Film Review)

I was not planning on writing about this film because, honestly, it's a whole mess, and we happen to be living in the first Eurovision-less year since the festival's foundation. I always thought my first post about Europe's best and most infamous festivity would be talking about some of its most iconic moments and commenting the songs in the weeks leading up to it. And then, boom!, Coronavirus.

But... I've seen people watching the Rachel McAdams and Will Ferrell movie (yes, in that order, as it should be) out of desperation for new content, and I thought: why not? It's not the best 2020 release I've seen (or even the best one I've watched since I began writing the blog) but those are either a bit too far away in time, or I saw them long after they dropped, so this can be a fun warm-up in preparation for more reviews to come, and I will type a more comprehensive compilation of what I've seen this year so far (great films like Shirley or The Lodge) later on this month.

Miss Scientology never disappoints

So... what is it about? For those of you unlucky non-Europeans, the Eurovision Song Contest is a music (and then some) competition held every year in the nation which won the previous time (2020 was gonna be Rotterdam, The Netherlands) in which every competing country sends a song performed by a singer, duo, grup or any other combination up to six people and then they vote for their favorite entry, giving from one to the now iconic 12 points, until a winner is chosen.

As a citizen of sunny Spain, we get to participate every year. And because our country contributes heavily (in the money department) to the European Broadcasting Union, we always advance directly to the final, instead of fighting for a spot in semis (lucky us; otherwise we wouldn't make it almost any year). What's our usual performance, you ask? Well...

Notice how Portugal keeps scoring 12 and yet we stay at 0 points? Our power!

But let's not dwell in the details because, let's be honest, no one involved in this film has spent more than five minutes researching what Eurovision actually is. They saw a video on twitter and thought: "What on the fuck is this?" And that is how this movie was born. To be fair, just by looking at the trailer, you could see this was trashy, but I'm at a point where my brain cells are dying and it was either this or the Steve Carell political comedy with a 46 Metascore, so I had to compromise.

Actually, lies. There was no way I was not watching this. And there are moments in which it's fun and worth the watch, too! The songs are absolutely what you could expect from a Eurovision contestant (seriously, the first song you hear, that is Eurovision), and Rachel McAdams EATS in absolutely all of them (but also, in her entire comedic performance, as we should expect from Miss Regina George and how much fun she was in Game Night).


This banger in question... coming from a Scandinavian or Eastern country, this would be a Top 10 right here.

But see, even here you can feel whoever was involved in thinking up this movie didn't know enough about the fest (or understand its trends well enough). You don't win Eurovision by serving vocals and bringing the house down, like at the end of every theatre-nerd wet dream. Not necessarily. The song that is actually selected to represent Iceland is a clear flop. It smells bottom 5 from the very beginning. Over-complicated stage props? Check. A powerhouse balad with some cringe-inducing background dancing? Check. A duo that doens't match at all? Check, check, check.

Which rarely matters because the film is not as worried with the ins and outs of the festival as it should, but it merely uses it to frame the story it wants to tell. And that story is not nearly as interesting, engaging, or fun. Ferrell fights with some Americans, telling them they're dumb and encouraging them to leave Iceland alone, but actually, this movie is not for Eurovision fans, but for the Americans that know very little about it.

Rachel, you served in this, and you were so cute, too, but if we had to have a Eurovision movie with a man and a woman, we deserved one with these two.

And as such, the real story is about a traditionally odd straight couple which finds love against all odds. Yes, the moment in which past Eurovision contestants and winners show up is a nice one. And no one can argue against having Graham Norton commenting the whole show. But when you have such an exceptionally fun, culturally rich background, it's a crime to use it as a prop then try to make us believe Rachel McAdams is dying to bag Will Ferrell, especially considering how annoying he is in this movie.

Dan Stevens shows up, proving his career is based on accepting any offer they throw at him. And he has fun with it, but even his there-no-gay-people-in-Russia schtick feels like little and poorly executed, he couldn't even end up with the Fleabag guy he so clearly has had something with? Like that's really the first joke that came to mind to the writers when looking for a low hanging target and they still couldn't give it some satisfying payoff.

"There no gay people in Russia" but he shows up like this singing a song with four shirtless dancers who are practically grinding on him? Sure!

And even if you've decided you don't care about all of this and you're just trying to have fun, every time you begin to get into it, some annoying detail brings you right back out: the host city is in Ireland (which hasn't won the contest since 1996 and last year failed to reach the final), but Norton is the commentator; they give out points in the semifinals (which doesn't happen), then they leave out the BEST part of the whole thing, which is when the countries actually vote in the final, because Ferrell sacrifices his dream for McAdams' (that was sort of sweet) and they're disqualified; Spain is in the semi-finals, and it shows TWICE in the rankings, remaining dead last even as it gets points; we don't get to know the winner; have I said Ferrell is really annoying in this? The list is LONG.

The deserving winner

And the ending... "Is it like the Voice?", ask the Americans. Ironic how Ferrell chastises them for that question when that ending is zero Eurovision and 100% America. The song is good, and depending on whether it came from Australia or the UK, it could've either been a bottom or top 5 (closer to the earlier one, considering Ferrell's backing vocals). But you know the gays would've kicked them out of the stage for attempting such a cheesy gimmick. No straights at Eurovision! Only Dan Stevens pretending to be straight while doing this:

I mean, come on...

And finally, we get to the most important part: Icelandic Demi Lovato and fisherman Pierce Brosnan— Wait! They're telling me Rachel and Will's little stunt ran too long and we're out of time! Oh! Such a shame! Maybe next time.

The final verdict: Not nearly gay enough.

Thursday, June 25, 2020

“They tried to kill your famous— your favorite bitch!”: The perpetual Nicole Kidman Renaissance (part II)

Thursday, June 25, 2020 0
“They tried to kill your famous— your favorite bitch!”: The perpetual Nicole Kidman Renaissance (part II)
Okay, so... did Nicole actually speak those words? No. It was Miley Cyrus dressed in what looked like a sparkly bathing suit with huge lips on it. But do those words convey the full meaning of what went on with her career during the mid-to-late 2000s? Yes and no. The mysoginists critics had her knives out for her, but she also made some choices that can only be described as her Clown Behavior Era

Today we continue with the Nicole Kidman career retrospective we began in the previous post, and we'll continue where we left off: Nicole had just done Cold Mountain. She was a star, a critically acclaimed thespian, the woman who sang Something Stupid with Robbie Williams and then proceeded to realize he was hot and she had a yacht gathering dust she could bang him in. She collected $3 million for looking unattainable in a 30-second-long Chanel ad while Tom Cruise jumped, monkey-style, on top of Oprah's couch. She had won.

"I'm gonna fuck him tonight"

And then, things started to go downhill.

While "doing research" for this post, I got anxiety just by looking at the list of projects she has rejected through the years, but knowing what would actually be her slate of films in the mid-to-late 2000s, two of them jump out the most.

She was offered to play Katharine Hepburn in The Aviator by Martin Scorsese and either turned him down or had to drop out, giving Cate Blanchett (that thief!) Oscar #1. Years later, she did the same with The Reader, this time because she was pregnant with her first daughter (this one gets a pass because I know it was a special moment for her).

Nothing will ever pain me more than knowing Cate Blanchett made a career out of stealing scripts Nicole threw in her trash and making acting choices based on the quote "Feminist! Lesbian! Vagina!" while still being a whole-ass Woody Allen supporter.

That's two Oscars lost given away (generous queen) in the span of a few years. So one wonders: Whew! The sheer quality of the work she must have been offered and accepted during those years! Wig ready for take-off! Well... not quite.

Okay, okay, okay... this is kind of a false start because, even though Birth was dragged through the mud, it is also a prime example of her "they say the movie is trash but she's great in it" phase (which is, at this point, a genre in and of itself). And, critics be damned, I love this film. It's, maybe, a bit too heady, but I believe people got distracted with the controversial aspects of it (I'll let you find them out yourself, if you still haven't seen it) and missed out on a great movie and a near-perfection performance from Nicole, who is fantastic in this. The opera scene and her take on the Kubrick Stare make the film an unmissable one in her filmography for any fan who's worth the title.

Another example of "sort of trashed film/praised performance". I had read wonderful things about Nicole before watching, but it took me a much longer time to connect with the movie than in Birth's case. Nicole plays a pretty despicable character (probably, as unlikeable as she's ever been) and it's not until the half-way mark that the whole thing clicked for me. This is an actress giving one of her best, angriest, most toxic and razor sharp-edged performances while no one was watching and, here's a key to understanding the angst every Nicole Kidman fan must endure, in what is likely the only poorly recieved movie Noah Baumbach has ever done. She would repeat the feat with Lee Daniels, as I'll discuss later, but here, five years after her Oscar win, already dismissed again as a has-been, she kept trying to prove herself. And, if anyone had been paying attention, they would've realised... she did.

Ah, yes... my first mega-flop. Nine was the first film I stanned hard, mainly because I though life would be good and Marion would score an Oscar nom, no questions asked. Nowadays, I would simply see Rob Marshall directing and I would just know. I'm sorry, Ventura of 2009, but I'm different. The one silver lining? Had I been as atuned as I am today with my Nicole Kidman stan side, I don't think I would've survived it. One day, someone will explain what went wrong with this adaptation, in an eleven hours-long documentary where Meryl Streep will play Nicole and get another Oscar nomination.
Thankfully enough, life would give me reasons to believe soon after. Rabbit Hole is one of my favorite Nicole Kidman films and performances. She's just gut-wrenching in this, probably because she felt deeply connected to the subject matter. There are movies that leave a leave a mark on me, in a way that, years later, I remember where I was and how I felt when I saw them. When the credits rolled on Rabbit Hole, I was alone in my kitchen, it was night, and a cool breeze went by me. Such a hard movie, and yet I finished it feeling hopeful.

And then came The Paperboy. I know sometimes successful comebacks don't translate into better roles, especially for older actresses, but... whew! This is not one of those cases where a good performance saves a mediocre movie. The Paperboy is utter trash. Disgusting, unpleasant to watch, nonsensical... Two silver linings: Nicole is expectably great and Zac Efron is as hot as he's been. But is it enough to make it worth watching? Definitely not. A definitive skip.

It's a pitty critics focused on her Paperboy turn and ignored her for Stoker, because she's great in this, and the film is quite good. Foreign directors' forays into English-language movies are rarely critically acclaimed (Lanthimos might be an exception, even though The Favourite was the first film of his I truly loved) but, at least for Nicole's performance and that infamous speech, this deserved more attention.

When faced with the decision of who on earth would play a trashy woman who pees on Zac Efron, someone told Lee Daniels "Call Nicole; she'll do it", so it truly shouldn't be a surprise that she later went on to play Paddington's bowl cut-wearing villain. Why? No one knows, but we're much better for it. Regardless of where this particular role stands in her list of best performances, Paddington (and its sequel) are cinematic treasures and, when it comes to Nicole, we shouldn't be asking ourselves "Why?" but "Why not?".

You can tell a straight man directed this film because that wig is simply atrocious. If you pretend this foray into indie features was what resulted in Billy Eichner organizing a Nicole Kidman awareness rally, though... it sort of makes it worth it (I checked, it sadly wasn't, the rally came first). The movie is unpretentiously solid, and Nicole proves, once again, she'll do anything (literally, look at this list), but Jason Bateman directed it, and he casually disregarded Jessica Walter while she cried because Jeffrey Tambor verbally harrassed her, so he can choke.

And we've gotten to the end of this second part. It's not necessarily Nicole's most successful era, but there are some real gems hidden in here, even those trapped inside mediocre or outright bad movies. Right after this, she would do Lion and Big Little Lies, and a new day would begin.

I'll talk about that, and more, in the next entry of this career retrospective. In the meantime, you can continue to vote for you favorite Nicole Kidman performance, and comment down below what you think about this uneven, yet daring, phase in her career. Until next time!

This is Nicole every time you comment and vote ;)

Saturday, June 20, 2020

“Well, I can wear heels now!”: The perpetual Nicole Kidman Renaissance (part I)

Saturday, June 20, 2020 0
“Well, I can wear heels now!”: The perpetual Nicole Kidman Renaissance (part I)

June 20th. An international holiday, a celebration of talent, a day of joy for the wig industry... you know which day it is: it's Nicole Kidman's birthday. The main bitch, the original Legend. Oscar and Emmy winner, future Survivor constestant, amateur clapper. Is there something Nicole-related that isn't iconic? No, there isn't.

After Marion Cotillard went into early retirement (and I will believe Annette exists when I see it with my own two eyes), Nicole Kidman regained the throne as my favorite actress. A new day was born, 2017 rolled over and so it began: The Nicole Kidman Renaissance (or Kidmanaissance, as I called it and repeated to my friends and family until they wouldn't listen anymore). 

I can pretend Marion is staring at her, I can pretend Nine wasn't a flop and they shared scenes, I can close my eyes and forget they almost starred in The Danish Girl together but then we got Eddie Redmayne... I can do all that; and I should be allowed to do that.

But pretending we discovered her talent with Big Little Lies is a very revisionist version of her career and achievements. Nicole Kidman has proven her worth from the start, even if the world and the industry didn't seem ready to pay attention for a while. Since today is her birthday, and she won (by a nose) the poll I made on twitter over Marion Cotillard (which will get her own entry some day soon), this is as good an opportunity as any to dive into a retrospective of her work, and to see why the word "Renaissance" has been linked to it from the very beginning.

Since I'll talk about those films of her I have seen, and I have seen A LOT, I'll divide it in three separate entries, with films in chronological order. This first one will cover her beginnings and rise to fame; the second one, the middling mid-2000s to mid-2010s; and, the third, the Nicole Kidman Renaissance.

During this time, you'll be able to vote for your favorite Nicole Kidman performance here. I don't know exactly how much time it will take me to write the three posts, so the poll doesn't have a deadline (I wouldn't now how to add it, though jajaja). When the third entry is published, I'll let you know how much time you have left here and on twitter, and finally, I'll make a fourth one with the results.

I'm so excited to talk about my main girl, so without further ado, here it begins: Nicole Kidman, her beginnings and rise to fame.

Nicole's Australian origins is probably the period of her career I have seen less films of. Dead calm is one of the last movies from her I've watched, and although she brings her typically fierce commitment to the role, it's torture to witness all she goes through. I'm sorry Miss Queen, but the gun and the spear thingy were there from the start. Had it been me, Billy Zane and that useless dog would've been out in five minutes.
Murdering your husband so you can be on television? Check. Serving looks? Check. Using Casey Affleck so he'll do your dirty work and then framing him for the crime? Check, check, check. By the time this film was being made, Hollywood already thought Nicole had no talent, because she had spent the previous five years fighting Scientology from within. With To Die For, she proved her range and talent for comedy, something which the industry has seemingly forgotten since.

Does anyone even know what this film is about? No, you don't. Because Tom Cruise is the lead in it, and you couldn't care less about what that little goblin says or does. Nicole is in it mainly in the beginning, but did she conclude here her Scientology annihilation by serving looks the likes of which have not been seen since and outshining Cruise in every scene she's in? Oh, absolutely. Her weed-induced epiphany is cinematic history.

By far Nicole's best wig. The early 2000s were the beginning of her rise to worldwide stardom. If you mention her name to your older family members, they'll say something misogynistic about her appearance and then they'll mention Moulin Rouge. For those who still saw her as Tom Cruise's wife, she proved she could act, sing, dance, break her ribs while attempting to tighten her corset to Vivien Leigh levels, and defrost the Ice Queen trope that had been assigned to her. Her Your Song bloopers with a never hotter Ewan McGregor have more chemistry than 99% of Hollywood sex scenes.
Did you know this was a Spanish film? The director, Alejandro Amenábar, is from my country, and this is one of Nicole's most iconic and remembered movies. Going from Moulin Rouge to The Others in the span of one year is what proves that she can do anything. When I say Grinch hands, you say range! Grinch hands...! This character also goes to show that Nicole has always had an ecclectic taste when it comes to her choices and that she likes her movies with a bit of edge in them. This is peak movie star era, and she anchors the film with her charisma and electrifying presence.

In my opinion, her best. She's been in indie stuff, in more daring, less baity productions and roles, but her train station scene in The Hours can not be topped. Her ability to go from suffocated to enraged, to mesmerized by the concept of death allowed her to win a Best Actress Oscar even if she had the least amount of screentime among her acting counterparts (an excellent Julianne Moore, in one of her best depressed-50s-housewife roles; and She-Who-Must-Not-Be-Named, who overacted through all her scenes, as she does). This film, along with Nicole and Julianne's performances in it, lighted the fire of my love for cinema and actresses, and I will forever be grateful for it.

In this blog, we don't claim Lars von Trier, and I can only imagine the shit he made her go through during filming, but Nicole's performance in it is absolutely magnetic. The fact that she chose to do this project, shot in what looks like an oversized garage, right after winning an Oscar should tell you everything about her commitment to the craft and her blind belief in art as an expression form. She's a character actress trapped in the body of a movie star, and it was never as clear as here.
As far as memory goes, this was my first Nicole Kidman film. I saw it over and over because they kept showing it on TV on sunday afternoons and my enthrallment with it should've probably been and early sign that I was gay as hell. It was also the peak of Renée Zellweger's career, back when the world was good and her, Nicole and Julianne had all the good roles. Needless to say, I learned all of Zellgy's iconic lines by hard. Also iconic? Nicole's character says "I can nail Jude Law even though I have only talked to him twice and then he went to war!". And she does... An inspiration to us all.

And then came the mid-2000s and they were like... They tried to kill your famous your favorite bitch! If you are around my age, a 90s kid, you came across Nicole's career when it was, pretty much, in the toilet. I was lucky enough to really start being invested in cinema in the late 2000s, and my first full on awards race was 2010 (her Rabbit Hole comeback), but the world still had a twisted enough sense of humor to put my two favorite actresses (Nicole and Marion Cotillard) in the first flop I stanned: Nine.

But I'm getting ahead of myself. We'll cover all that in the next extry. Until then, don't forget to vote for your favorite performance HERE and do share your thoughts on the movies I've talked about so far in the comments. Do not fail Legend!


Do it for her